Tectonic plate
African Plate
A major plate carrying Africa and part of the surrounding ocean floor. It is being actively split in East Africa, where a new spreading centre may be developing.
Figure by Lithoen. Plate model PB2002 from Bird (2003), doi:10.1029/2001GC000252; GIS conversion by Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, ODC-By 1.0. Made with Natural Earth. Underlying data remain under their own licences. · LITHOEN-ORIGINAL · Derivative: Generated from published Lithoen spatial records by scripts/generate-maps.ts; no coordinate was edited by hand. Features spanning ±180° are split for rendering only; the stored geometry is unchanged.
Classification
- plate class
- major
How this is mapped
7 published representations of where African Plate is. Each is one interpretation, by one identified source, at one scale — not the shape of the thing itself.
Tectonic model geometry
Polygon · 431 positionspreferred for publicationGeometry that exists because a model defines it — a rigid-plate outline, a zone where a model declares itself inapplicable. It is a property of the model, and changes when the model is revised. It is present-day geometry from a present-day model; a palaeogeographic reconstruction is a different thing and Lithoen does not hold one.
The African Plate as outlined in model PB2002 (Bird, 2003). This is the model’s boundary, not a mapped geological contact: it is where a rigid-plate model puts the edge of a plate, and Bird’s own documentation states that coordinates are given to a precision of about 60 m while "accuracy never equals precision". Where deformation is distributed rather than confined to a line, the model marks the region as an orogen and the outline there is a convenience.
- Boundary certainty
- InterpretedThe boundary was placed by a geologist reading evidence: mapping, geophysics, geochronology, structure. It is reproducible from that evidence and it is an interpretation of it. Most geological boundaries are this.
- Status of this geometry
- modelledThe status of the geometry, which need not match the status of what the entity’s claims assert.
- Dataset
- PB2002 plates, boundaries and orogens as GeoJSON (fraxen/tectonicplates)Plate model PB2002 from Bird (2003), doi:10.1029/2001GC000252; GIS conversion by Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, ODC-By 1.0.
What was done to this geometry
- By Lithoen — Douglas–Peucker, 806 positions to 431
- By Lithoen — Coordinates rounded to 4 decimal places, about 11 m of longitude at the equator.
- Before it reached Lithoen — Bird (2003) digitised the boundary curves from published sources at varying scales; the model is a compilation, not a single survey.
- Before it reached Lithoen — The GIS conversion (Ahlenius, ODC-By 1.0) split segments spanning the -180/180 meridian and moved them, as its README states. Four plates therefore arrive as multi-part geometries.
Boundary
MultiLineString · 72 positionsA line delimiting or separating things — a plate boundary, a suture, a mapped contact. A boundary is not an extent: it says where the edge runs, not what lies on either side.
African–Antarctic boundary as drawn in model PB2002 (Bird, 2003), from source segments AF-AN, AN-AF. The Southwest Indian Ridge, one of the slowest-spreading centres known, where the mantle is exposed on the sea floor over long stretches. The model applies no class to these segments. Bird states that a single class cannot always be specified for an entire boundary curve, or even for an entire segment, because the class changes with local changes in azimuth — so Lithoen classifies no further than the source does. Digitised by: Lemaux et al. [2002]; Mueller et al. [1987]; by Peter Bird, October 2001.
- Boundary certainty
- InterpretedThe boundary was placed by a geologist reading evidence: mapping, geophysics, geochronology, structure. It is reproducible from that evidence and it is an interpretation of it. Most geological boundaries are this.
- Status of this geometry
- modelledThe status of the geometry, which need not match the status of what the entity’s claims assert.
- Dataset
- PB2002 plates, boundaries and orogens as GeoJSON (fraxen/tectonicplates)Plate model PB2002 from Bird (2003), doi:10.1029/2001GC000252; GIS conversion by Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, ODC-By 1.0.
What was done to this geometry
- By Lithoen — 3 source features carrying the same identifier were combined into one multi-part geometry; no coordinate was altered by the combination.
- By Lithoen — Coordinates rounded to 4 decimal places, about 11 m of longitude at the equator.
- Before it reached Lithoen — Bird (2003) compiled these curves from published sources at varying scales, crediting each segment to its own source; those credits are carried in the caption of every record.
- Before it reached Lithoen — The GIS conversion (Ahlenius, ODC-By 1.0) split segments spanning the -180/180 meridian and moved them, as its README states.
Boundary
MultiLineString · 51 positionsA line delimiting or separating things — a plate boundary, a suture, a mapped contact. A boundary is not an extent: it says where the edge runs, not what lies on either side.
African–Arabian boundary as drawn in model PB2002 (Bird, 2003), from source segments AF-AR, AR-AF. The Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, where continental rifting has gone far enough to make new ocean floor. Lithoen records the Red Sea Rift as an ocean basin caught in the act of opening. The model applies no class to these segments. Bird states that a single class cannot always be specified for an entire boundary curve, or even for an entire segment, because the class changes with local changes in azimuth — so Lithoen classifies no further than the source does. Digitised by: Brian Taylor, pers. comm., 2002; McClusky et al., 2000; Peter Bird, June 2002.
- Boundary certainty
- InterpretedThe boundary was placed by a geologist reading evidence: mapping, geophysics, geochronology, structure. It is reproducible from that evidence and it is an interpretation of it. Most geological boundaries are this.
- Status of this geometry
- modelledThe status of the geometry, which need not match the status of what the entity’s claims assert.
- Dataset
- PB2002 plates, boundaries and orogens as GeoJSON (fraxen/tectonicplates)Plate model PB2002 from Bird (2003), doi:10.1029/2001GC000252; GIS conversion by Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, ODC-By 1.0.
What was done to this geometry
- By Lithoen — 3 source features carrying the same identifier were combined into one multi-part geometry; no coordinate was altered by the combination.
- By Lithoen — Coordinates rounded to 4 decimal places, about 11 m of longitude at the equator.
- Before it reached Lithoen — Bird (2003) compiled these curves from published sources at varying scales, crediting each segment to its own source; those credits are carried in the caption of every record.
- Before it reached Lithoen — The GIS conversion (Ahlenius, ODC-By 1.0) split segments spanning the -180/180 meridian and moved them, as its README states.
Boundary
MultiLineString · 164 positionsA line delimiting or separating things — a plate boundary, a suture, a mapped contact. A boundary is not an extent: it says where the edge runs, not what lies on either side.
African–Eurasian boundary as drawn in model PB2002 (Bird, 2003), from source segments EU-AF. The Africa–Eurasia convergent zone through the Mediterranean, which includes the Alps. Bird’s criteria exclude the Alps from the subduction class, and the model’s Alps orogen marks the region where a rigid-plate description stops working. The model applies no class to these segments. Bird states that a single class cannot always be specified for an entire boundary curve, or even for an entire segment, because the class changes with local changes in azimuth — so Lithoen classifies no further than the source does. The segments of this plate pair are split across two records because the source labels part of it subduction and part of it unclassified; merging them would have asserted one class for the whole. Digitised by: W part, by Peter Bird, 1999; by Peter Bird, 2002.03.
- Boundary certainty
- InterpretedThe boundary was placed by a geologist reading evidence: mapping, geophysics, geochronology, structure. It is reproducible from that evidence and it is an interpretation of it. Most geological boundaries are this.
- Status of this geometry
- modelledThe status of the geometry, which need not match the status of what the entity’s claims assert.
- Dataset
- PB2002 plates, boundaries and orogens as GeoJSON (fraxen/tectonicplates)Plate model PB2002 from Bird (2003), doi:10.1029/2001GC000252; GIS conversion by Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, ODC-By 1.0.
What was done to this geometry
- By Lithoen — 4 source features carrying the same identifier were combined into one multi-part geometry; no coordinate was altered by the combination.
- By Lithoen — Coordinates rounded to 4 decimal places, about 11 m of longitude at the equator.
- Before it reached Lithoen — Bird (2003) compiled these curves from published sources at varying scales, crediting each segment to its own source; those credits are carried in the caption of every record.
- Before it reached Lithoen — The GIS conversion (Ahlenius, ODC-By 1.0) split segments spanning the -180/180 meridian and moved them, as its README states.
Boundary
MultiLineString · 29 positionsA line delimiting or separating things — a plate boundary, a suture, a mapped contact. A boundary is not an extent: it says where the edge runs, not what lies on either side.
African–Eurasian boundary as drawn in model PB2002 (Bird, 2003), from source segments EU/AF, EU\AF. The Africa–Eurasia convergent zone through the Mediterranean, which includes the Alps. Bird’s criteria exclude the Alps from the subduction class, and the model’s Alps orogen marks the region where a rigid-plate description stops working. The model labels these segments as subduction. The segments of this plate pair are split across two records because the source labels part of it subduction and part of it unclassified; merging them would have asserted one class for the whole. Digitised by: Peter Bird, September 2001; by Peter Bird, 2002.03.
- Boundary certainty
- InterpretedThe boundary was placed by a geologist reading evidence: mapping, geophysics, geochronology, structure. It is reproducible from that evidence and it is an interpretation of it. Most geological boundaries are this.
- Status of this geometry
- modelledThe status of the geometry, which need not match the status of what the entity’s claims assert.
- Dataset
- PB2002 plates, boundaries and orogens as GeoJSON (fraxen/tectonicplates)Plate model PB2002 from Bird (2003), doi:10.1029/2001GC000252; GIS conversion by Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, ODC-By 1.0.
What was done to this geometry
- By Lithoen — 3 source features carrying the same identifier were combined into one multi-part geometry; no coordinate was altered by the combination.
- By Lithoen — Coordinates rounded to 4 decimal places, about 11 m of longitude at the equator.
- Before it reached Lithoen — Bird (2003) compiled these curves from published sources at varying scales, crediting each segment to its own source; those credits are carried in the caption of every record.
- Before it reached Lithoen — The GIS conversion (Ahlenius, ODC-By 1.0) split segments spanning the -180/180 meridian and moved them, as its README states.
Boundary
MultiLineString · 125 positionsA line delimiting or separating things — a plate boundary, a suture, a mapped contact. A boundary is not an extent: it says where the edge runs, not what lies on either side.
African–Somali boundary as drawn in model PB2002 (Bird, 2003), from source segments AF-SO, SO-AF. The East African Rift, drawn here as a plate boundary because model PB2002 treats Somalia as a separate plate from Africa. Whether the rift has yet made two plates is a question about how much relative motion a model needs before it draws a line, not a fact about the rock. The model applies no class to these segments. Bird states that a single class cannot always be specified for an entire boundary curve, or even for an entire segment, because the class changes with local changes in azimuth — so Lithoen classifies no further than the source does. Digitised by: Lemaux et al. [2002]; Peter Bird, June 2002; by Peter Bird, September 2001.
- Boundary certainty
- InterpretedThe boundary was placed by a geologist reading evidence: mapping, geophysics, geochronology, structure. It is reproducible from that evidence and it is an interpretation of it. Most geological boundaries are this.
- Status of this geometry
- modelledThe status of the geometry, which need not match the status of what the entity’s claims assert.
- Dataset
- PB2002 plates, boundaries and orogens as GeoJSON (fraxen/tectonicplates)Plate model PB2002 from Bird (2003), doi:10.1029/2001GC000252; GIS conversion by Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, ODC-By 1.0.
What was done to this geometry
- By Lithoen — 3 source features carrying the same identifier were combined into one multi-part geometry; no coordinate was altered by the combination.
- By Lithoen — Coordinates rounded to 4 decimal places, about 11 m of longitude at the equator.
- Before it reached Lithoen — Bird (2003) compiled these curves from published sources at varying scales, crediting each segment to its own source; those credits are carried in the caption of every record.
- Before it reached Lithoen — The GIS conversion (Ahlenius, ODC-By 1.0) split segments spanning the -180/180 meridian and moved them, as its README states.
Boundary
MultiLineString · 258 positionsA line delimiting or separating things — a plate boundary, a suture, a mapped contact. A boundary is not an extent: it says where the edge runs, not what lies on either side.
African–South American boundary as drawn in model PB2002 (Bird, 2003), from source segments AF-SA. The southern Mid-Atlantic Ridge. The fit of the two coastlines either side of it was one of the first arguments for continental drift, and the ridge between them is why the fit is no longer exact. The model applies no class to these segments. Bird states that a single class cannot always be specified for an entire boundary curve, or even for an entire segment, because the class changes with local changes in azimuth — so Lithoen classifies no further than the source does. Digitised by: Mueller et al. [1987]; by Peter Bird, October 2001.
- Boundary certainty
- InterpretedThe boundary was placed by a geologist reading evidence: mapping, geophysics, geochronology, structure. It is reproducible from that evidence and it is an interpretation of it. Most geological boundaries are this.
- Status of this geometry
- modelledThe status of the geometry, which need not match the status of what the entity’s claims assert.
- Dataset
- PB2002 plates, boundaries and orogens as GeoJSON (fraxen/tectonicplates)Plate model PB2002 from Bird (2003), doi:10.1029/2001GC000252; GIS conversion by Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, ODC-By 1.0.
What was done to this geometry
- By Lithoen — 3 source features carrying the same identifier were combined into one multi-part geometry; no coordinate was altered by the combination.
- By Lithoen — Coordinates rounded to 4 decimal places, about 11 m of longitude at the equator.
- Before it reached Lithoen — Bird (2003) compiled these curves from published sources at varying scales, crediting each segment to its own source; those credits are carried in the caption of every record.
- Before it reached Lithoen — The GIS conversion (Ahlenius, ODC-By 1.0) split segments spanning the -180/180 meridian and moved them, as its README states.
In the knowledge graph
- African Plate diverges from Arabian Plate
- African Plate adjacent to Antarctic Plate
- African Plate adjacent to Arabian Plate
- African Plate adjacent to Eurasian Plate
- African Plate adjacent to Somali Plate
- African Plate adjacent to South American Plate
- African Plate bounded by Red Sea Rift
- African Plate is the location of East African Rift
Record last updated 2026-09-06. Corrections follow the published corrections policy; superseded claims are retained, never silently edited.