Tectonic plate
Eurasian Plate
A major plate carrying Europe and most of Asia. It separates from the North American Plate along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and converges with the Indian Plate along the Himalayan collision zone.
Figure by Lithoen. Plate model PB2002 from Bird (2003), doi:10.1029/2001GC000252; GIS conversion by Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, ODC-By 1.0. Made with Natural Earth. Underlying data remain under their own licences. · LITHOEN-ORIGINAL · Derivative: Generated from published Lithoen spatial records by scripts/generate-maps.ts; no coordinate was edited by hand. Features spanning ±180° are split for rendering only; the stored geometry is unchanged.
Classification
- plate class
- major
How this is mapped
3 published representations of where Eurasian Plate is. Each is one interpretation, by one identified source, at one scale — not the shape of the thing itself.
Tectonic model geometry
Polygon · 404 positionspreferred for publicationGeometry that exists because a model defines it — a rigid-plate outline, a zone where a model declares itself inapplicable. It is a property of the model, and changes when the model is revised. It is present-day geometry from a present-day model; a palaeogeographic reconstruction is a different thing and Lithoen does not hold one.
The Eurasian Plate as outlined in model PB2002 (Bird, 2003). This is the model’s boundary, not a mapped geological contact: it is where a rigid-plate model puts the edge of a plate, and Bird’s own documentation states that coordinates are given to a precision of about 60 m while "accuracy never equals precision". Where deformation is distributed rather than confined to a line, the model marks the region as an orogen and the outline there is a convenience.
- Boundary certainty
- InterpretedThe boundary was placed by a geologist reading evidence: mapping, geophysics, geochronology, structure. It is reproducible from that evidence and it is an interpretation of it. Most geological boundaries are this.
- Status of this geometry
- modelledThe status of the geometry, which need not match the status of what the entity’s claims assert.
- Dataset
- PB2002 plates, boundaries and orogens as GeoJSON (fraxen/tectonicplates)Plate model PB2002 from Bird (2003), doi:10.1029/2001GC000252; GIS conversion by Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, ODC-By 1.0.
What was done to this geometry
- By Lithoen — Douglas–Peucker, 1131 positions to 404
- By Lithoen — Coordinates rounded to 4 decimal places, about 11 m of longitude at the equator.
- Before it reached Lithoen — Bird (2003) digitised the boundary curves from published sources at varying scales; the model is a compilation, not a single survey.
- Before it reached Lithoen — The GIS conversion (Ahlenius, ODC-By 1.0) split segments spanning the -180/180 meridian and moved them, as its README states. Four plates therefore arrive as multi-part geometries.
Boundary
MultiLineString · 95 positionsA line delimiting or separating things — a plate boundary, a suture, a mapped contact. A boundary is not an extent: it says where the edge runs, not what lies on either side.
Eurasian–Indian boundary as drawn in model PB2002 (Bird, 2003), from source segments EU-IN, IN-EU. The India–Eurasia collision, which raised the Himalaya and the Tibetan Plateau. Bird’s subduction criteria explicitly EXCLUDE the Himalaya, so this boundary is not labelled a subduction zone in the model even though convergence across it is unambiguous. The model applies no class to these segments. Bird states that a single class cannot always be specified for an entire boundary curve, or even for an entire segment, because the class changes with local changes in azimuth — so Lithoen classifies no further than the source does. Digitised by: by Peter Bird, 1999; by Peter Bird, October 2001.
- Boundary certainty
- InterpretedThe boundary was placed by a geologist reading evidence: mapping, geophysics, geochronology, structure. It is reproducible from that evidence and it is an interpretation of it. Most geological boundaries are this.
- Status of this geometry
- modelledThe status of the geometry, which need not match the status of what the entity’s claims assert.
- Dataset
- PB2002 plates, boundaries and orogens as GeoJSON (fraxen/tectonicplates)Plate model PB2002 from Bird (2003), doi:10.1029/2001GC000252; GIS conversion by Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, ODC-By 1.0.
What was done to this geometry
- By Lithoen — 3 source features carrying the same identifier were combined into one multi-part geometry; no coordinate was altered by the combination.
- By Lithoen — Coordinates rounded to 4 decimal places, about 11 m of longitude at the equator.
- Before it reached Lithoen — Bird (2003) compiled these curves from published sources at varying scales, crediting each segment to its own source; those credits are carried in the caption of every record.
- Before it reached Lithoen — The GIS conversion (Ahlenius, ODC-By 1.0) split segments spanning the -180/180 meridian and moved them, as its README states.
Boundary
MultiLineString · 569 positionsA line delimiting or separating things — a plate boundary, a suture, a mapped contact. A boundary is not an extent: it says where the edge runs, not what lies on either side.
Eurasian–North American boundary as drawn in model PB2002 (Bird, 2003), from source segments EU-NA, NA-EU. The northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge, where sea floor is created and the two plates move apart. The ridge is the type example of a divergent boundary and the place where sea-floor spreading was first read from magnetic stripes. The model applies no class to these segments. Bird states that a single class cannot always be specified for an entire boundary curve, or even for an entire segment, because the class changes with local changes in azimuth — so Lithoen classifies no further than the source does. Digitised by: Mueller et al. [1987]; by Peter Bird, 1999; by Peter Bird, November 2001.
- Boundary certainty
- InterpretedThe boundary was placed by a geologist reading evidence: mapping, geophysics, geochronology, structure. It is reproducible from that evidence and it is an interpretation of it. Most geological boundaries are this.
- Status of this geometry
- modelledThe status of the geometry, which need not match the status of what the entity’s claims assert.
- Dataset
- PB2002 plates, boundaries and orogens as GeoJSON (fraxen/tectonicplates)Plate model PB2002 from Bird (2003), doi:10.1029/2001GC000252; GIS conversion by Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, ODC-By 1.0.
What was done to this geometry
- By Lithoen — 4 source features carrying the same identifier were combined into one multi-part geometry; no coordinate was altered by the combination.
- By Lithoen — Coordinates rounded to 4 decimal places, about 11 m of longitude at the equator.
- Before it reached Lithoen — Bird (2003) compiled these curves from published sources at varying scales, crediting each segment to its own source; those credits are carried in the caption of every record.
- Before it reached Lithoen — The GIS conversion (Ahlenius, ODC-By 1.0) split segments spanning the -180/180 meridian and moved them, as its README states.
In the knowledge graph
- Eurasian Plate is the location of Himalaya
- Eurasian Plate converges with Indian Plate
- Eurasian Plate bounded by Mid-Atlantic Ridge
- Eurasian Plate diverges from North American Plate
- Eurasian Plate adjacent to African Plate
- Eurasian Plate adjacent to Amur Plate
- Eurasian Plate adjacent to Anatolian Plate
- Eurasian Plate adjacent to Arabian Plate
- Eurasian Plate adjacent to Indian Plate
- Eurasian Plate adjacent to North American Plate
Record last updated 2026-09-06. Corrections follow the published corrections policy; superseded claims are retained, never silently edited.