Each claim states how it is known and cites its evidence.
Establisheda redbed copper deposit
How a source classifies it
The usgs sediment-hosted copper database classifies San Romeleo as a redbed copper deposit.
- definition basis: Deposit-type field of the USGS sediment-hosted copper database, whose values are enumerated in the dataset itself.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_CLASSIFICATION
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
Established1.29 wt%m Copper
Reported for this deposit
The usgs sediment-hosted copper database reports a copper grade of 1.29 weight percent for San Romeleo.
- scope: depositAverage
- definition basis: Grade as the compilation reports it for this deposit.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_REPORTED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
EstablishedFeldspathic sandstone; calcareous; gypsiferous; bituminous
Reported for this deposit
The rocks reported as hosting San Romeleo are Feldspathic sandstone, calcareous, gypsiferous, bituminous, as named for this deposit by the USGS sediment-hosted copper database.
- precision note: The host lithologies are those the compilation names for this deposit. They are not inferred from a class description and not from a point falling inside a mapped polygon.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_REPORTED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
Establishedchalcanthite; malachite; azurite; brochanthite; antlerite; chalcocite; cuprite; bitumen
Reported for this deposit
The compilation reports 8 distinct minerals present at San Romeleo: chalcanthite, malachite, azurite, brochanthite, antlerite, chalcocite, cuprite, bitumen. It records presence only: no abundance, no paragenesis and no assay follows from it.
- precision note: The compilation's mineral table holds 8 entries for this row, and the claim counts all 8 of them. The prose names 8 because a sentence of 8 mineral names is not readable; the count is stated so the list is never mistaken for the whole. Presence is not abundance, and the alphabetical order carries no paragenetic meaning.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_REPORTED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
EstablishedRecorded as a deposit by the USGS sediment-hosted copper database, record 780.
How a source classifies it
San Romeleo is recorded as a deposit because the USGS sediment-hosted copper database includes it, as record 780. The compilation is a database of sediment-hosted copper deposits and carries this row among them.
- source record: usgs-sediment-hosted-copper-deposits-of-the-world record 780
- assertion basis: SOURCE_CLASSIFICATION
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
Open question
Derived by Lithoen
Lithoen records no mineral-system interpretation for San Romeleo. The corpus models six mineral systems and sediment-hosted copper is not among them, so there is nothing here to interpret this deposit as. The absence is a gap in Lithoen's system layer, not a statement about the deposit.
- precision note: Forcing this deposit into the nearest system the corpus happens to hold would assert a classification no source made.
- assertion basis: LITHOEN_DERIVED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
Established0.257 Mt
Reported for this deposit
The usgs sediment-hosted copper database reports an ore tonnage of 0.257 million tonnes for San Romeleo.
- tonnage category: compilerTotalForModelling
- definition basis: Ore tonnage as the compilation reports it for this deposit, compiled for grade-and-tonnage modelling rather than as a resource statement under a reporting code.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_REPORTED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority