tectonic context
What a geological province is
A named, map-scale region distinguished by its geology and its history. Its identity is the name and the rocks; its outline is a separate thing entirely, and there may be several of those.
About: Superior Province · Kaapvaal Craton
A region is not a polygon
Lithoen stores a geological region and a drawing of where it is as two different records, and this is the architectural commitment of the whole phase. A craton is not a polygon. A polygon is one published opinion about where a craton is, drawn at one scale, by one group, from one kind of evidence, on one date — and another group’s polygon may put the edge somewhere else.[1]
Embedding one outline in the entity would assert, permanently and silently, that the outline is the region. It would also leave nowhere to put the second outline. So a region carries as many spatial representations as there are interpretations Lithoen has read, each with its own source, its own scale, its own statement of how certain the edge is, and its own epistemic status.[1,2]
The kinds, and why they are values rather than types
Craton, shield, platform, terrane, orogenic belt, sedimentary basin, volcanic arc, large igneous province, passive margin, rift province, mobile belt, geological domain. These are recorded as a controlled value on one entity type rather than as thirteen types, because they share every field and every relation, they overlap, and one piece of crust is legitimately several of them at different scales.[1]
Where a source delimits a region without classifying it, the honest value is geological domain. A guess dressed as a classification is worse than an admission that the source did not say.[1]
What a region record does not contain
No country. Geology does not obey political borders, and a province that crosses six of them is not six provinces. Lithoen records a continental or oceanic realm for navigation and nothing else.[1]
No assessment. A region record says what is there and how that is known. It does not say what might be there, and there is a validator whose job is to keep it that way.[1]
Commonly misunderstood
Often said
“A geological province has a definite boundary.”
What the evidence supports
Most geological boundaries are interpretations. A drawn line may be a contact somebody walked, a change inferred from geophysics beneath cover, a gradation over tens of kilometres, or a boundary that exists because a model needs one — and at map scale they look identical.
Supporting records: boundary-may-be-interpretive
Bracketed references link to the structured entity records whose claims support each paragraph. Last updated 2026-09-07.