Each claim states how it is known and cites its evidence.
Establisheda reduced-facies copper deposit
How a source classifies it
The usgs sediment-hosted copper database classifies Konrad as a reduced-facies copper deposit.
- definition basis: Deposit-type field of the USGS sediment-hosted copper database, whose values are enumerated in the dataset itself.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_CLASSIFICATION
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
Established0.7 wt%m Copper
Reported for this deposit
The usgs sediment-hosted copper database reports a copper grade of 0.7 weight percent for Konrad.
- scope: depositAverage
- definition basis: Grade as the compilation reports it for this deposit.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_REPORTED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
EstablishedShale; siltstone
Reported for this deposit
The rocks reported as hosting Konrad are Shale, siltstone, as named for this deposit by the USGS sediment-hosted copper database.
- precision note: The host lithologies are those the compilation names for this deposit. They are not inferred from a class description and not from a point falling inside a mapped polygon.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_REPORTED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
Establishedchalcocite; covellite; bornite; chalcopyrite; galena; sphalerite; hematite
Reported for this deposit
The compilation reports 7 distinct minerals present at Konrad: chalcocite, covellite, bornite, chalcopyrite, galena, sphalerite, hematite. It records presence only: no abundance, no paragenesis and no assay follows from it.
- precision note: The compilation's mineral table holds 7 entries for this row, and the claim counts all 7 of them. The prose names 7 because a sentence of 7 mineral names is not readable; the count is stated so the list is never mistaken for the whole. Presence is not abundance, and the alphabetical order carries no paragenetic meaning.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_REPORTED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
EstablishedRecorded as a deposit by the USGS sediment-hosted copper database, record 312.
How a source classifies it
Konrad is recorded as a deposit because the USGS sediment-hosted copper database includes it, as record 312. The compilation is a database of sediment-hosted copper deposits and carries this row among them.
- source record: usgs-sediment-hosted-copper-deposits-of-the-world record 312
- assertion basis: SOURCE_CLASSIFICATION
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
Open question
Derived by Lithoen
Lithoen records no mineral-system interpretation for Konrad. The corpus models six mineral systems and sediment-hosted copper is not among them, so there is nothing here to interpret this deposit as. The absence is a gap in Lithoen's system layer, not a statement about the deposit.
- precision note: Forcing this deposit into the nearest system the corpus happens to hold would assert a classification no source made.
- assertion basis: LITHOEN_DERIVED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
Established182.5 Mt
Reported for this deposit
The usgs sediment-hosted copper database reports an ore tonnage of 182.5 million tonnes for Konrad.
- tonnage category: compilerTotalForModelling
- definition basis: Ore tonnage as the compilation reports it for this deposit, compiled for grade-and-tonnage modelling rather than as a resource statement under a reporting code.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_REPORTED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority