Each claim states how it is known and cites its evidence.
Established13 wt%m Copper
Reported for this deposit
The usgs sediment-hosted copper database reports a copper grade of 13.0 weight percent for Kennecott.
- scope: depositAverage
- definition basis: Grade as the compilation reports it for this deposit.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_REPORTED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
EstablishedStromatolitic limestone; dolomite; microbial mats.
Reported for this deposit
The rocks reported as hosting Kennecott are Stromatolitic limestone, dolomite, microbial mats., as named for this deposit by the USGS sediment-hosted copper database.
- precision note: The host lithologies are those the compilation names for this deposit. They are not inferred from a class description and not from a point falling inside a mapped polygon.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_REPORTED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
Establishedchalcocite; djurleite; covellite; bornite; chalcopyrite; digenite; anilite; luzonite; azurite; malchite
Reported for this deposit
The compilation reports 10 distinct minerals present at Kennecott: chalcocite, djurleite, covellite, bornite, chalcopyrite, digenite, anilite, luzonite, azurite, malchite. It records presence only: no abundance, no paragenesis and no assay follows from it.
- precision note: The compilation's mineral table holds 10 entries for this row, and the claim counts all 10 of them. The prose names 10 because a sentence of 10 mineral names is not readable; the count is stated so the list is never mistaken for the whole. Presence is not abundance, and the alphabetical order carries no paragenetic meaning.
- source verbatim: The compilation writes “malchite” for this row. Malchite names a fine-grained dyke rock, not an ore mineral, and the string may equally be a typing error for malachite, which would be unremarkable in a copper deposit. Lithoen cannot tell which was meant and has chosen neither.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_REPORTED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
EstablishedRecorded as a deposit by the USGS sediment-hosted copper database, record 785.
How a source classifies it
Kennecott is recorded as a deposit because the USGS sediment-hosted copper database includes it, as record 785. The compilation is a database of sediment-hosted copper deposits and carries this row among them.
- source record: usgs-sediment-hosted-copper-deposits-of-the-world record 785
- assertion basis: SOURCE_CLASSIFICATION
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
Open question
Derived by Lithoen
Lithoen records no mineral-system interpretation for Kennecott. The corpus models six mineral systems and sediment-hosted copper is not among them, so there is nothing here to interpret this deposit as. The absence is a gap in Lithoen's system layer, not a statement about the deposit.
- precision note: Forcing this deposit into the nearest system the corpus happens to hold would assert a classification no source made.
- assertion basis: LITHOEN_DERIVED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority
Established4 Mt
Reported for this deposit
The usgs sediment-hosted copper database reports an ore tonnage of 4.0 million tonnes for Kennecott.
- tonnage category: compilerTotalForModelling
- definition basis: Ore tonnage as the compilation reports it for this deposit, compiled for grade-and-tonnage modelling rather than as a resource statement under a reporting code.
- assertion basis: SOURCE_REPORTED
Evidence support: Supported by the cited evidence · 2 sources, single source
Evidence: D.P. 2003 · Primary authority