deposits
What a deposit coordinate means
A point on a deposit map is not the deposit. It is a position somebody placed, at a precision they wrote down, inside a zone that may be kilometres across — and the file it arrives in will happily give you thirteen decimal places.
About: Bingham Canyon
A point inside a zone
The compilers of the sediment-hosted zinc-lead database say exactly what their coordinates are. All locations were checked against satellite imagery; many differ substantially from previously published positions as a result; and a location "is intended to plot within the alteration zone of deposit which may be kilometers across". It is a point inside a zone, not the centre of one and not a shaft.[1]
Lithoen therefore stores these as representative points with approximate boundary certainty, and draws no polygon around any of them. Where only a point exists, only a point is published: a shape invented around a coordinate would be a claim about extent that nobody made.[1]
Thirteen decimal places of nothing
The decimal-degree columns of the porphyry database carry up to fifteen decimal places. A tenth of a micrometre. Those digits are floating-point residue from the degrees, minutes and seconds the compilers actually wrote: 355 of the 690 rows have no seconds at all and were authored to the nearest minute, about 1.85 kilometres, and some to the whole degree.[1]
Publishing the stored digits would assert a position about a billion times better known than the one anybody determined. Lithoen rounds each point to the coarser of its two axes and records the authored precision on the record, where a validator checks it. Chuquicamata lands at two decimal places because its longitude was written to the minute even though its latitude has seconds; Oyu Tolgoi lands at two because its latitude is a whole degree.[1]
And sometimes there is no coordinate at all
Thirteen of the deposits in this corpus carry no position. The chromite, laterite and volcanogenic massive sulfide models locate their examples by naming a region and by figures at continental scale, and neither accepted database covers those classes. Each of those records says so in a claim rather than leaving the page quiet.[1]
The alternative would have been to look the name up somewhere and write down what came back. A coordinate obtained that way is indistinguishable, on the page and in the data, from one a compiler placed against imagery — which is precisely why it must not be done.[1]
Commonly misunderstood
Often said
“More decimal places means a better-known position.”
What the evidence supports
The porphyry database stores up to fifteen and authored, in most rows, three: degrees and minutes. The extra digits are unit-conversion residue.
Supporting records: deposit-coordinate-precision
Often said
“A deposit marker shows where the deposit is.”
What the evidence supports
It shows a point the compilers placed somewhere inside a zone that may be kilometres across. The deposit is bigger than the dot and not centred on it.
Supporting records: deposit-coordinate-is-a-point-in-a-zone
Bracketed references link to the structured entity records whose claims support each paragraph. Last updated 2026-09-07.